Instead, Campbell told the jury that there is a balance between the right of free speech and the intrusion into private lives-instructing the jurors to determine the difference between what “ceases to be the giving of legitimate information to which the public is entitled and becomes a morbid and sensational prying into private lives for its own sake.”Īccording to knowledgeable observers, that was practically a direction to find for the plaintiff. She consistently ruled against Gawker and in favor of Hogan, who enjoyed a home field advantage as a resident of nearby Tampa.Ĭampbell, according to observers sympathetic to Gawker, delivered instructions to the jury that defied legal precedent in cases involving news organizations-namely, she rejected the notion that the First Amendment usually is a more powerful consideration than privacy when it comes to public figures. Campbell of the Pinellas County Circuit Court. The verdict says ‘No more.’”ĭenton, for his part, tried to put the best face on a legal catastrophe that occurred with the apparent encouragement of trial judge, Jeb Bush appointee Pamela A.M. “We think it represents a statement as to the public’s disgust with the invasion of privacy disguised as journalism. “We’re exceptionally happy with the verdict,” Team Hogan said in a statement. As Denton said repeatedly in interviews leading up to the trial, that alone could put him out of business.įor Gawker Media, the verdict was a nightmare scenario made flesh, and co-defendants Denton and Daulerio, Gawker’s editor-in-chief when he published the video, sat frozen in apparent shock as the verdict was read.īy contrast the 62-year-old Hogan-legal name: Terry Bollea-burst into sobs, tears of joy no doubt, while he was hugged by his triumphant team of attorneys, and later departed the courthouse amid a throng cheering admirers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |